Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30042380›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Enhancing coevolution-based contact prediction by imposing structural self-consistency of the contacts.

Maher M Kassem, Lars B Christoffersen, Andrea Cavalli, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maher M KassemLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen, DK, 2200, Denmark.
Lars B ChristoffersenLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen, DK, 2200, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3065-9610
Andrea CavalliInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Via Vincenzo Vela 6, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland. andrea.cavalli@irb.usi.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-4063-4502
Kresten Lindorff-LarsenLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen, DK, 2200, Denmark. lindorff@bio.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-6039

Funding

Lundbeckfonden (Lundbeck Foundation) R126-2012- 12589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the development of new algorithms and growth of sequence databases, it has recently become possible to build robust higher-order sequence models based on sets of aligned protein sequences. Such models have proven useful in de novo structure prediction, where the sequence models are used to find pairs of residues that co-vary during evolution, and hence are likely to be in spatial proximity in the native protein. The accuracy of these algorithms, however, drop dramatically when the number of sequences in the alignment is small. We have developed a method that we termed CE-YAPP (CoEvolution-YAPP), that is based on YAPP (Yet Another Peak Processor), which has been shown to solve a similar problem in NMR spectroscopy. By simultaneously performing structure prediction and contact assignment, CE-YAPP uses structural self-consistency as a filter to remove false positive contacts. Furthermore, CE-YAPP solves another problem, namely how many contacts to choose from the ordered list of covarying amino acid pairs. We show that CE-YAPP consistently improves contact prediction from multiple sequence alignments, in particular for proteins that are difficult targets. We further show that the structures determined from CE-YAPP are also in better agreement with those determined using traditional methods in structural biology.

Identifiers

PMID30042380
PMCPMC6057941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.