Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30042357›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2018

Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Fabricated in Dissolvable 3D-Printed Molds for Patient-Specific Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.

Angela Alarcon de la Lastra, Katherine R Hixon, Lavanya Aryan, Amanda N Banks, Alexander Y Lin, Andrew F Hall, Scott A Sell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Embedded 3D Printing of Cryogel-Based Scaffolds.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angela Alarcon de la LastraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. angela.alarcondelalastra@slu.edu.
Katherine R HixonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. katherine.hixon@slu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-5537
Lavanya AryanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. lavanya.aryan@slu.edu.
Amanda N BanksDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. amanda.banks@slu.edu.
Alexander Y LinDepartment of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. alexander.lin@health.slu.edu.
Andrew F HallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. andy.hall@slu.edu.
Scott A SellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. scott.sell@slu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6785-3193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current gold standard treatment for oral clefts is autologous bone grafting. This treatment, however, presents another wound site for the patient, greater discomfort, and pediatric patients have less bone mass for bone grafting. A potential alternative treatment is the use of tissue engineered scaffolds. Hydrogels are well characterized nanoporous scaffolds and cryogels are mechanically durable, macroporous, sponge-like scaffolds. However, there has been limited research on these scaffolds for cleft craniofacial defects. 3D-printed molds can be combined with cryogel/hydrogel fabrication to create patient-specific tissue engineered scaffolds. By combining 3D-printing technology and scaffold fabrication, we were able to create scaffolds with the geometry of three cleft craniofacial defects. The scaffolds were then characterized to assess the effect of the mold on their physical properties. While the scaffolds were able to completely fill the mold, creating the desired geometry, the overall volumes were smaller than expected. The cryogels possessed porosities ranging from 79.7% to 87.2% and high interconnectivity. Additionally, the cryogels swelled from 400% to almost 1500% of their original dry weight while the hydrogel swelling did not reach 500%, demonstrating the ability to fill a defect site. Overall, despite the complex geometry, the cryogel scaffolds displayed ideal properties for bone reconstruction.

Indexed as

3D printingbone regenerationcraniofacial defectscryogelhydrogelpatient-specifictissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30042357
PMCPMC6165179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.