Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30042320›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles: A Brief Review of Their Synthesis Methods and Biomedical Applications.

Atul Dhall, William Self

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multifactorial Role of Phytogenic CeOPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CeOPlant molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Atul DhallColleges of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Albany, NY 12203, USA. adhall@sunypoly.edu.
William SelfBurnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA. william.self@ucf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeNPs) exhibit antioxidant properties both in vitro and in vivo. This is due to the self-regeneration of their surface, which is based on redox-cycling between 3+ and 4+ states for cerium, in response to their immediate environment. Additionally, oxygen vacancies in the lattice structure allow for alternating between CeO₂ and CeO

Indexed as

antioxidantsbiocompatibilitycerium oxide nanoparticlesenzyme mimeticsgreen synthesislanthanidenanoceriaoxidative stresspersonalized medicineredox-cycling

Identifiers

PMID30042320
PMCPMC6116044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.