ArticleBioscience reports2018
A multiplex loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid screening of
Article in Bioscience reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification with a Lateral Flow Dipstick for Detection of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in the Detection of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Molecular methods for rapid detection and identification of foodborne pathogenic bacteria.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- The intricacies ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Single-channel digital LAMP multiplexing using amplification curve analysis.Sensors & diagnostics · 2022Article
- Recent advances in loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for rapid and efficient detection of pathogens.Current research in microbial sciences · 2022Review
- Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.