Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30042097›Full record

ReviewBlood2018

Differentiation-based model of hematopoietic stem cell functions and lineage pathways.

Thomas Höfer, Hans-Reimer Rodewald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Direct megakaryopoiesis.Current opinion in hematology · 2025
    Review
  10. The Sympathetic Nervous Influence on Hematopoiesis Up To Date.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Decoding mFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas HöferDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3560-8780
Hans-Reimer RodewaldDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in genetic labeling and barcoding of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in situ now allow direct measurements of physiological HSC output, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Turning on a heritable label in HSCs and measuring the kinetics of label emergence in downstream compartments reveal rates of differentiation and self-renewal of HSCs and progenitor cells, whereas endogenous HSC barcoding probes physiological precursor-product relationships. Labels have been inserted at different stages of the hematopoietic differentiation hierarchy. Recent genetic and functional evidence suggests a phenotype (

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell DifferentiationGene Expression RegulationHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsHumans

Identifiers

PMID30042097
PMCPMC6307983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.