ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2018
Change-point detection method for clinical decision support system rule monitoring.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bayesian multivariate longitudinal piecewise regression: detecting early onset of cognitive decline.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Using automated methods to detect safety problems with health information technology: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Real-Time User Feedback to Support Clinical Decision Support System Improvement.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A clinical decision support system (CDSS) helps clinicians to manage patients, but malfunctions of its components or other systems on which it depends may affect its intended functions. Monitoring the system and detecting changes in its behavior that may indicate the malfunction can help to avoid any potential costs associated with its improper operation. In this paper, we investigate the problem of detecting changes in the CDSS operation, in particular its monitoring and alerting subsystem, by monitoring its rule firing counts. We aim to screen and detect changes in real-time, that is whenever a new datum (rule firing count) arrives, we want to have a score indicating how likely there is a change in the system. We develop a new method based on Seasonal-Trend decomposition with locally weighted regression (Loess) and likelihood ratio statistics to detect the changes. Experiments on daily rule-firing-count data collected from a real CDSS and known change-points show that our method improves the detection performance when compared with existing change-point detection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.