Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30041705›Full record

SynthesisBMC research notes2018

Developing a synthetic psychosocial stress measure and harmonizing CVD-risk data: a way forward to GxE meta- and mega-analyses.

Abanish Singh, Michael A Babyak, Beverly H Brummett, William E Kraus, Ilene C Siegler, Elizabeth R Hauser, Redford B Williams

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abanish SinghBehavioral Medicine Research Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. abanish.singh@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-0466
Michael A BabyakBehavioral Medicine Research Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Beverly H BrummettBehavioral Medicine Research Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
William E KrausDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Ilene C SieglerBehavioral Medicine Research Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Elizabeth R HauserDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Redford B WilliamsBehavioral Medicine Research Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

The Genetics Of Biobehavioral Risk Factors For CVDP01HL036587 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUS, WILLIAM E · 1986 to 2020
$35.9M
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute P01HL036587NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL036587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAmong many challenges in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction are interactions of genes with stress, race, and/or sex and developing robust estimates of these interactions. Improved power with larger sample size contributed by the accumulation of epidemiological data could be helpful, but integration of these datasets is difficult due the absence of standardized phenotypic measures. In this paper, we describe the details of our undertaking to harmonize a dozen datasets and provide a detailed account of a number of decisions made in the process.

resultsWe harmonized candidate genetic variants and CVD-risk variables related to demography, adiposity, hypertension, lipodystrophy, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, depressive symptom, and chronic psychosocial stress from a dozen studies. Using our synthetic stress algorithm, we constructed a synthetic chronic psychosocial stress measure in nine out of twelve studies where a formal self-rated stress measure was not available. The mega-analytic partial correlation between the stress measure and depressive symptoms while controlling for the effect of study variable in the combined dataset was significant (Rho = 0.27, p < 0.0001). This evidence of the validity and the detailed account of our data harmonization approaches demonstrated that it is possible to overcome the inconsistencies in the collection and measurement of human health risk variables.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalDemographyGenetic VariationHumansHypertensionSample SizeStatistics as TopicCorrelationCVD-riskData harmonizationDepressive symptomsGxE interactionMega-analysisSynthetic psychosocial stress

Identifiers

PMID30041705
PMCPMC6057001
OpenAlexW2884542467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.