Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30041431›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Trinity of Three-Dimensional (3D) Scaffold, Vibration, and 3D Printing on Cell Culture Application: A Systematic Review and Indicating Future Direction.

Haobo Yuan, Ke Xing, Hung-Yao Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A State-of-the-Art of Functional Scaffolds for 3D Nervous Tissue Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Research Advance of Cell BridgesFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A Systematic Study on Design Initiation of Conceptual 3DPVS.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haobo YuanSchool of Engineering, University of South Australia; Mawson Lakes Blvd, Mawson Lakes 5095, Australia. haobo.yuan@mymail.unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0061-9762
Ke XingSchool of Engineering, University of South Australia; Mawson Lakes Blvd, Mawson Lakes 5095, Australia. Ke.Xing@unisa.edu.au.
Hung-Yao HsuSchool of Engineering, University of South Australia; Mawson Lakes Blvd, Mawson Lakes 5095, Australia. Hung-Yao.Hsu@unisa.edu.au.
University of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell culture and cell scaffold engineering have previously developed in two directions. First can be 'static into dynamic', with proven effects that dynamic cultures have benefits over static ones. Researches in this direction have used several mechanical means, like external vibrators or shakers, to approximate the dynamic environments in real tissue, though such approaches could only partly address the issue. Second, can be '2D into 3D', that is, artificially created three-dimensional (3D) passive (also called 'static') scaffolds have been utilized for 3D cell culture, helping external culturing conditions mimic real tissue 3D environments in a better way as compared with traditional two-dimensional (2D) culturing. In terms of the fabrication of 3D scaffolds, 3D printing (3DP) has witnessed its high popularity in recent years with ascending applicability, and this tendency might continue to grow along with the rapid development in scaffold engineering. In this review, we first introduce cell culturing, then focus 3D cell culture scaffold, vibration stimulation for dynamic culture, and 3DP technologies fabricating 3D scaffold. Potential interconnection of these realms will be analyzed, as well as the limitations of current 3D scaffold and vibration mechanisms. In the recommendation part, further discussion on future scaffold engineering regarding 3D vibratory scaffold will be addressed, indicating 3DP as a positive bridging technology for future scaffold with integrated and localized vibratory functions.

Indexed as

3D printed vibratory scaffold3D printing (3DP), system evolution3D scaffold3D static or passive scaffoldcell culturedynamicity and dimensionalitydynamic scaffoldfuture scaffold engineeringvibration

Identifiers

PMID30041431
PMCPMC6164136
OpenAlexW2883703143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.