Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30041105›Full record

Trial reportEvaluation and program planning2018

Development of tailored feedback reports on organizational capacity for health promotion in African American churches.

Cheryl L Holt, Rachel C Shelton, Jennifer D Allen, Janice Bowie, Lina Jandorf, Sherie Lou Zara Santos, Jimmie Slade

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Evaluation and program planning, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cheryl L HoltUniversity of Maryland, School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, 1234W Public Health Building (255), College Park, MD 20742, USA. Electronic address: cholt14@umd.edu.
Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia's Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: rs3108@cumc.columbia.edu.
Jennifer D AllenDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, 574 Boston Avenue-Suite 208, Medford, MA 02155, USA. Electronic address: jennifer.allen@tufts.edu.
Janice BowieJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: jbowie2@jhu.edu.
Lina JandorfIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Oncological Sciences, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA. Electronic address: lina.jandorf@mssm.edu.
Sherie Lou Zara SantosUniversity of Maryland, School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, 1234W Public Health Building (255), College Park, MD 20742, USA. Electronic address: sherie.lou@gmail.com.
Jimmie SladeCommunity Ministry of Prince George's County, P.O. Box 250, Upper Marlboro, MD 20773, USA. Electronic address: jaslade@verizon.net.

Funding

Implementation of evidence-based cancer early detection in Black churchesR01CA147313 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KNOTT, CHERYL L · 2011 to 2016
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA147313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard community-engaged research methods involve reporting research findings back to study participants. Project HEAL is an implementation trial conducted in 14 African American churches. This paper reports on a strengths-based approach to reporting Project HEAL organizational capacity data back to church leadership, through use of individualized church reports. Pastors in each church completed a church organizational capacity assessment. The study team, including community partners representing church leadership, co-created a channel and content to disseminate the capacity data back to Project HEAL church leaders. This consisted of a 4-page lay report that included the church's capacity scores, and recommendations for future evidence-based health promotion programming matched to their capacity. The study team was able to meet with nine of the 14 churches to review the report, which took an average of six and a half weeks to schedule. The individualized church reports were well-received by pastors, who expressed an intention to share the information with others in the church and to sustain health promotion activities in their organizations. Though the individualized reports were embraced by the pastors, it is unknown whether this process will result in sustainable health promotion in these organizations without further follow-up.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationReligion and MedicineBlack or African AmericanCapacity BuildingCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHealth PromotionHumansNeoplasmsProgram DevelopmentAfrican AmericanCapacityChurchesFeedbackSustainabilityTailoring

Identifiers

PMID30041105
PMCPMC6077099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.