Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30041067›Full record

ArticleConsciousness and cognition2018

The varieties of inner speech questionnaire - Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology.

Ben Alderson-Day, Kaja Mitrenga, Sam Wilkinson, Simon McCarthy-Jones, Charles Fernyhough

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Consciousness and cognition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Self-directed speech and attention deficit hyperactive disorder-like behaviours.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ben Alderson-DayDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Benjamin.alderson-day@durham.ac.uk.
Kaja MitrengaDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, United Kingdom.
Sam WilkinsonSchool of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Dugald Stewart Building, 3 Charles Street, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Simon McCarthy-JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James Hospital, James's Street, Dublin, Ireland.
Charles FernyhoughDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT098455Wellcome Trust WT108720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inner speech is a common experience for many but hard to measure empirically. The Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire (VISQ) has been used to link everyday phenomenology of inner speech - such as inner dialogue - to various psychopathological traits. However, positive and supportive aspects of inner speech have not always been captured. This study presents a revised version of the scale - the VISQ-R - based on factor analyses in two large samples: respondents to a survey on inner speech and reading (N = 1412) and a sample of university students (N = 377). Exploratory factor analysis indicated a five-factor structure including three previous subscales (dialogic, condensed, and other people in inner speech), an evaluative/critical factor, and a new positive/regulatory factor. Confirmatory factor analysis then replicated this structure in sample 2. Hierarchical regression analyses also replicated a number of relations between inner speech, hallucination-proneness, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and dissociation.

Indexed as

Self-ControlAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHallucinationsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRumination, CognitiveSpeechSpeech PerceptionHallucinationsPrivate speechRuminationSelf-regulationSelf-talk

Identifiers

PMID30041067
PMCPMC6204885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.