Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30040826›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Specific human antibody responses to Aedes aegypti and Aedes polynesiensis saliva: A new epidemiological tool to assess human exposure to disease vectors in the Pacific.

Françoise Mathieu-Daudé, Aurore Claverie, Catherine Plichart, Denis Boulanger, Fingani A Mphande, Hervé C Bossin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibodies toFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Françoise Mathieu-DaudéUMR MIVEGEC, IRD, CNRS, UM, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie.ORCID 0000-0003-2994-3697
Aurore ClaveriePôle de recherche et de veille sur les maladies infectieuses émergentes, Institut Louis Malardé, Papeete, Tahiti, Polynésie française.ORCID 0000-0002-4227-2851
Catherine PlichartPôle de recherche et de veille sur les maladies infectieuses émergentes, Institut Louis Malardé, Papeete, Tahiti, Polynésie française.
Denis BoulangerUMR MIVEGEC IRD, CNRS, UM, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8757-0350
Fingani A MphandeUMR MIVEGEC, IRD, CNRS, UM, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie.
Hervé C BossinLaboratoire d'entomologie médicale, Institut Louis Malardé, Paea, Tahiti, Polynésie française.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAedes mosquitoes severely affect the health and wellbeing of human populations by transmitting infectious diseases. In French Polynesia, Aedes aegypti is the main vector of dengue, chikungunya and Zika, and Aedes polynesiensis the primary vector of Bancroftian filariasis and a secondary vector of arboviruses. Tools for assessing the risk of disease transmission or for measuring the efficacy of vector control programmes are scarce. A promising approach to quantify the human-vector contact relies on the detection and the quantification of antibodies directed against mosquito salivary proteins. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsAn ELISA test was developed to detect and quantify the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) directed against proteins from salivary gland extracts (SGE) of Ae. aegypti and Ae. polynesiensis in human populations exposed to either species, through a cross-sectional study. In Tahiti and Moorea islands where Ae. aegypti and Ae. polynesiensis are present, the test revealed that 98% and 68% of individuals have developed IgG directed against Ae. aegypti and Ae. polynesiensis SGE, respectively. By comparison, ELISA tests conducted on a cohort of people from metropolitan France, not exposed to these Aedes mosquitoes, indicated that 97% of individuals had no IgG directed against SGE of either mosquito species. The analysis of additional cohorts representing different entomological Aedes contexts showed no ELISA IgG cross-reactivity between Ae. aegypti and Ae. polynesiensis SGE. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The IgG response to salivary gland extracts seems to be a valid and specific biomarker of human exposure to the bites of Ae. aegypti and Ae. polynesiensis. This new immuno-epidemiological tool will enhance our understanding of people exposure to mosquito bites, facilitate the identification of areas where disease transmission risk is high and permit to evaluate the efficacy of novel vector control strategies in Pacific islands and other tropical settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAedesAnimalsAntibody FormationChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansInsect Bites and StingsInsect ProteinsMaleMiddle AgedMosquito VectorsInsect ProteinsSalivary Proteins and Peptides

Identifiers

PMID30040826
PMCPMC6075770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.