ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Pareto Optimization of Combinatorial Mutagenesis Libraries.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-guided co-optimization of fitness and diversity facilitates combinatorial library design in enzyme engineering.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Optimal trade-off control in machine learning-based library design, with application to adeno-associated virus (AAV) for gene therapy.Science advances · 2024Article
- Peptide design by optimization on a data-parameterized protein interaction landscape.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to increase the hit rate of discovering diverse, beneficial protein variants via high-throughput screening, we have developed a computational method to optimize combinatorial mutagenesis libraries for overall enrichment in two distinct properties of interest. Given scoring functions for evaluating individual variants, POCoM (Pareto Optimal Combinatorial Mutagenesis) scores entire libraries in terms of averages over their constituent members, and designs optimal libraries as sets of mutations whose combinations make the best trade-offs between average scores. This represents the first general-purpose method to directly design combinatorial libraries for multiple objectives characterizing their constituent members. Despite being rigorous in mapping out the Pareto frontier, it is also very fast even for very large libraries (e.g., designing 30 mutation, billion-member libraries in only hours). We here instantiate POCoM with scores based on a target's protein structure and its homologs' sequences, enabling the design of libraries containing variants balancing these two important yet quite different types of information. We demonstrate POCoM's generality and power in case study applications to green fluorescent protein, cytochrome P450, and β-lactamase. Analysis of the POCoM library designs provides insights into the trade-offs between structure- and sequence-based scores, as well as the impacts of experimental constraints on library designs. POCoM libraries incorporate mutations that have previously been found favorable experimentally, while diversifying the contexts in which these mutations are situated and maintaining overall variant quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.