ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
"Super Gene Set" Causal Relationship Discovery from Functional Genomics Data.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative systems and functional analyses reveal a role of dopaminergic signaling in myelin pathogenesis.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this article, we present a computational framework to identify "causal relationships" among super gene sets. For "causal relationships," we refer to both stimulatory and inhibitory regulatory relationships, regardless of through direct or indirect mechanisms. For super gene sets, we refer to "pathways, annotated lists, and gene signatures," or PAGs. To identify causal relationships among PAGs, we extend the previous work on identifying PAG-to-PAG regulatory relationships by further requiring them to be significantly enriched with gene-to-gene co-expression pairs across the two PAGs involved. This is achieved by developing a quantitative metric based on PAG-to-PAG Co-expressions (PPC), which we use to infer the likelihood that PAG-to-PAG relationships under examination are causal-either stimulatory or inhibitory. Since true causal relationships are unknown, we approximate the overall performance of inferring causal relationships with the performance of recalling known r-type PAG-to-PAG relationships from causal PAG-to-PAG inference, using a functional genomics benchmark dataset from the GEO database. We report the area-under-curve (AUC) performance for both precision and recall being 0.81. By applying our framework to a myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) dataset, we further demonstrate that this framework is effective in helping build multi-scale biomolecular systems models with new insights on regulatory and causal links for downstream biological interpretations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.