Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30040550›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2018

Uterus Transplantation: The Ethics of Using Deceased Versus Living Donors.

Bethany Bruno, Kavita Shah Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. New Frontiers in Reproductive Health: Australians' Support for Uterus Transplantation.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Uterus transplantation: state of the art in 2021.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021
    Review
  13. Options for acquiring motherhood in absolute uterine factor infertility; adoption, surrogacy and uterine transplantation.The obstetrician & gynaecologist : the journal for continuing professional development from the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bethany Brunoa Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-6876
Kavita Shah Arorab Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-9466

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandKL2TR000440 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$11.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002547 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DWEIK, RAED A. · 2018 to 2022
$7.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000440NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research teams have made considerable progress in treating absolute uterine factor infertility through uterus transplantation, though studies have differed on the choice of either deceased or living donors. While researchers continue to analyze the medical feasibility of both approaches, little attention has been paid to the ethics of using deceased versus living donors as well as the protections that must be in place for each. Both types of uterus donation also pose unique regulatory challenges, including how to allocate donated organs; whether the donor / donor's family has any rights to the uterus and resulting child; how to manage contact between the donor / donor's family, recipient, and resulting child; and how to track outcomes moving forward.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleLiving DonorsOrgan TransplantationReproductive Techniques, AssistedTissue and Organ HarvestingTissue and Organ ProcurementUterusinformed consentorgan transplantationrationing/resource allocationregulatory issuesreproductive technologies

Identifiers

PMID30040550
PMCPMC6296249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.