Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30040228›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in mouse biology2018

Engineering Point Mutant and Epitope-Tagged Alleles in Mice Using Cas9 RNA-Guided Nuclease.

Marina Gertsenstein, Lauryl M J Nutter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in mouse biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tackling Tissue Macrophage Heterogeneity by SplitCre Transgenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Genetic and Molecular Quality Control of Genetically Engineered Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancers from NovelCancer research · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Off- and on-target effects of genome editing in mouse embryos.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina GertsensteinThe Centre for Phenogenomics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lauryl M J NutterThe Centre for Phenogenomics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAToronto Centre for Phenogenomics · CA

Funding

KOMP2-Phase3 Production and Phenotyping by the DTCC Consortium TCP Transfer to UC DavisUM1OD023221 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KC KENT LLOYD · 2016 to 2026
$45.7M
KOMP Phase II Mouse Production and CryopreservationU42OD011175 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LLOYD, KC KENT · 2012 to 2015
$18.9M
NIH HHS U42 OD011175NIH HHS UM1 OD023221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice carrying patient-associated point mutations are powerful tools to define the causality of single-nucleotide variants to disease states. Epitope tags enable immuno-based studies of genes for which no antibodies are available. These alleles enable detailed and precise developmental, mechanistic, and translational research. The first step in generating these alleles is to identify within the target sequence-the orthologous sequence for point mutations or the N or C terminus for epitope tags-appropriate Cas9 protospacer sequences. Subsequent steps include design and acquisition of a single-stranded oligonucleotide repair template, synthesis of a single guide RNA (sgRNA), collection of zygotes, and microinjection or electroporation of zygotes with Cas9 mRNA or protein, sgRNA, and repair template followed by screening of born mice for the presence of the desired sequence change. Quality control of mouse lines includes screening for random or multicopy insertions of the repair template and, depending on sgRNA sequence, off-target mutations introduced by Cas9. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsElectroporationEndonucleasesGene EditingHumansMiceRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsZygoteEndonucleasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCas9electroporationepitope tagsgenome editingmicroinjectionmousepoint mutation

Identifiers

PMID30040228
PMCPMC9249120
OpenAlexW2795791084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.