Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30040191›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2019

Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing.

Andrew Wey, Sally K Gustafson, Nicholas Salkowski, Bertram L Kasiske, Melissa Skeans, Cory R Schaffhausen, Ajay K Israni, Jon J Snyder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Kidney transplant program waitlisting rate as a metric to assess transplant access.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  5. Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew WeyScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sally K GustafsonScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicholas SalkowskiScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bertram L KasiskeScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Melissa SkeansScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Cory R SchaffhausenDepartment of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ajay K IsraniScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jon J SnyderScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Creating a patient-centered report card for solid organ transplant candidatesR01HS024527 · AHRQ · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ISRANI, AJAY K · 2016 to 2020
$1.3M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024527AKI was partially supported by R01 HS 24527HRSA HHS HHSH250201500009CMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) is responsible for understandable reporting of program metrics, including transplant rate, waitlist mortality, and posttransplant outcomes. SRTR developed five-tier systems for each metric to improve accessibility for the public. We investigated the associations of the five-tier assignments at listing with all-cause candidate mortality after listing, for candidates listed July 12, 2011-June 16, 2014. Transplant rate evaluations with one additional tier were associated with lower mortality after listing in kidney (hazard ratio [HR],

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft RejectionHeart TransplantationHumansKidney TransplantationLung TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRegistriesRisk FactorsSurvival RateTransplant Recipientshealth services and outcomes researchorgan transplantation in generalScientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR)statistics

Identifiers

PMID30040191
PMCPMC6837730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.