ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018
A novel depth-of-interaction rebinning strategy for ultrahigh resolution PET.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Evaluation of a 3-D CZT Imaging Spectrometer for Potential Use in Compton-Enhanced PET Imaging.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2023Article
- Chemical and Biological Tools for the Study of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Electrogenesis and Nociception.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2022Review
- High-resolution and high-sensitivity PET for quantitative molecular imaging of the monoaminergic nuclei: A GATE simulation study.Medical physics · 2022Article
- 1700 nm optical coherence microscopy enables minimally invasive, label-free, in vivo optical biopsy deep in the mouse brain.Light, science & applications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small animal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging often requires high resolution (∼few hundred microns) to enable accurate quantitation in small structures such as animal brains. Recently, we have developed a prototype ultrahigh resolution depth-of-interaction (DOI) PET system that uses CdZnTe detectors with a detector pixel size of 350 μm and eight DOI layers with a 250 μm depth resolution. Due to the large number of line-of-response (LOR) combinations of DOIs, the system matrix for reconstruction is 64 times larger than that without DOI. While a high resolution virtual ring geometry can be employed to simplify the system matrix and create a sinogram, the LORs in such a sinogram tend to be sparse and irregular, leading to potential degradation of the reconstructed image quality. In this paper, we propose a novel high resolution sinogram rebinning method in which a uniform sub-sampling DOI strategy is employed. However, even with the high resolution rebinning strategy, the reconstructed image tends to be very noisy due to insufficient photon counts in many high resolution sinogram pixels. To reduce noise effects, we developed a penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction framework with the Poisson log-likelihood and a non-convex total variation penalty. Here, an ordered subsets separable quadratic surrogate and alternating direction method of multipliers are utilized to solve the optimization. To evaluate the performance of the proposed sub-sampling method and the penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction technique, we perform simulations and preliminary point source experiments. By comparing the reconstructed images and profiles based on sinograms without DOI, with rebinned DOI and with sub-sampled DOI, we demonstrate that the proposed method with sub-sampled DOIs can significantly improve the image quality with lower dose and yield a high resolution of <300 μm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.