ArticleAnalytical chemistry2018
Comprehensive Regression Model for Dissociation Equilibria of Cell-Specific Aptamers.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating FRET and Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Single-Molecule Aptameric Detection of Staphylococcus aureus IsdA Surface Protein.Biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Role of Natural Binding Proteins in Therapy and Diagnostics.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A comprehensive nonlinear regression model for dissociation equilibria of cell-specific aptamers is proposed by considering the effect of receptor expression level. Benefiting from the global regression of simultaneous equations, the fitted parameters reach a very significant level, indicating the statistical validity of this updated model. According to the fitting results, we found that dissociation constants fitted using the previous model are obviously larger than the updated values, which can be explained by the effect of receptor number on curve fitting. In addition, equivalent receptor density can be estimated using the updated model, which may lead to some new judgments about reported results of cell-SELEX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.