Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30039505›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2018

Evaluation of the Heat Sink Effect After Transarterial Embolization When Performed in Combination with Thermal Ablation of the Liver in a Rabbit Model.

Charles J Puza, Qi Wang, Charles Y Kim

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles J PuzaDivision of Interventional Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2311 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Qi WangDivision of Interventional Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2311 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Charles Y KimDivision of Interventional Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2311 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. charles.kim@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-1522
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Optimization of radiofrequency ablation with electrically conductive particlesR03CA191978 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, CHARLES Y · 2015 to 2017
$159k
Duke University Department of Radiology Charles Putnum Vision GrantNational Cancer Institute 5R03CA191978NCI NIH HHS R03 CA191978Radiological Society of North America Medical Student Research GrantSociety of Interventional Radiology Dr.Society of Interventional Radiology Mrs. W.C. Culp Student Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the contribution of the heat sink effect when combining thermal ablation with transarterial embolization (TAE). MATERIALS AND

methodsRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) were performed in the liver of non-tumor bearing rabbits. Three perfusion groups were used: rabbits that were killed then immediately ablated (non-perfused liver group to simulate embolized tumor with no heat sink), rabbits that underwent hepatic TAE followed by ablation (embolized liver group), and rabbits that underwent ablation while alive (normally perfused liver control group). For each perfusion group, 8 RFAs and 8 MWAs were performed. Probes were inserted using ultrasound guidance to avoid areas with major blood vessels. During ablation, temperatures were obtained from a thermocouple located 1 cm away from the ablation probe to assess heat conduction. With MWA, temperatures were also measured from the antennae tip.

resultsFor RFA, embolization of normal liver did not increase temperature conduction when compared to the control group. However, temperature conduction was significantly increased in the non-perfused group (simulating embolized tumor) compared to controls (p = 0.007). For MWA, neither embolization nor non-perfusion increased temperature conduction compared to controls. With MWA, the probe tip temperature was significantly higher in the non-perfused group compared to the control and embolized group.

conclusionsIn non-perfused tissue simulating tumor, RFA demonstrated modest enhancement of temperature conduction, whereas MWA did not. Embolization of normal liver did not affect RFA or MWA. Findings suggest that heat sink mitigation plays a limited role with combination embolization-ablation therapies, albeit more with RFA than MWA.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalHot TemperatureAnimalsCatheter AblationCombined Modality TherapyEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleLiverMicrowavesPerfusionRabbitsCombination therapyEmbolizationHeat sinkMicrowave ablationRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID30039505
PMCPMC6277256
OpenAlexW2883540343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.