Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30039466›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2018

[Big data and deep learning in preventive and rehabilitation medicine].

M Jäger, C Mayer, H Hefter, M Siebler, A Kecskeméthy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AN INTELLIGIBLE AI-DRIVEN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR POSTSTROKE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2025
    Article
  2. A Novel Multiple-Cue Observational Clinical Scale for Functional Evaluation of Gait After Stroke - The Stroke Mobility Score (SMS).Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M JägerKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45274, Essen, Deutschland. Marcus.Jaeger@uk-essen.de.
C MayerKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45274, Essen, Deutschland.
H HefterKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
M SieblerNeurologie, MediClin Fachklinik Rhein/Ruhr, Essen, Deutschland.
A KecskeméthyLehrstuhl für Mechanik und Robotik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digitalization in medicine has led to almost universal availability of information to different healthcare professionals and accelerated clinical pathways. Fast-track concepts and short hospital stays require intelligent and practicable systems in preventive and rehabilitation medicine. This includes optimization of movement analysis by innovative tools such as detectors sensing skin movements, portable feedback systems for monitoring, robot-assisted devices, and prevention programs based on reliable data. Finally, clinical structures are needed to exploit the maximal potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning. One example is the establishment of inter- and transdisciplinary professional teams such as a RehaBoard. In contrast to other cost-intensive disciplines such as oncology, the introduction of AI into rehabilitation orthopedics and trauma surgery with the support of cross-sectoral cooperation has great potential for performing well in patient benefit-orientated competition (value-based competition).

Indexed as

Big DataDeep LearningOrthopedicsRehabilitationArtificial IntelligenceHumansLength of StayArtificial intelligenceExoskeleton deviceLocomotionMusculoskeletal systemPreventive programs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.