ArticleExperimental brain research2018
Effects of acute trigeminal nerve stimulation on rest EEG activity in healthy adults.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcutaneous trigeminal nerve stimulation modulates the hand blink reflex.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- EEG microstate analysis in trigeminal neuralgia: identifying potential biomarkers for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Article
- Effects of online and offline trigeminal nerve stimulation on visuomotor learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Trigeminal nerve stimulation: a current state-of-the-art review.Bioelectronic medicine · 2023Review
- Neurophysiology, Neuro-Immune Interactions, and Mechanobiology in Osteopathy in the Cranial Field: An Evidence-Informed Perspective for a Scientific Rationale.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cognitive Functions following Trigeminal Neuromodulation.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Article
- Volunteers' concerns about facial neuromuscular electrical stimulation.BMC psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation method which is increasingly used for its beneficial effects on symptoms of several neuropsychiatric disorders such as drug-resistant epilepsy. Sites and mechanisms of its action are still unknown. The present study was aimed at investigating the physiological effects of acute TNS on rest electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. EEG was recorded with a 19-channel EEG system from 18 healthy adults who underwent 20 min of sham- and real-TNS (cycles of 30 s ON and 30 s OFF) in two separate sessions. EEG was continuously acquired in the 10-min preceding TNS, during TNS in the "OFF" period and throughout 10 min after TNS. Mean frequency, total power over the 0.5-48 Hz frequency range and absolute power for delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma bands were analyzed by a discrete Fast Fourier Transform algorithm. Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric coherences were also analyzed for each band at different time points. Intra- and interhemispheric coherences were significantly reduced for the beta frequencies only during real-TNS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006, respectively). No TNS effect on the power spectra of any band was detected. A trend of increase in the mean EEG frequency total power during real-TNS (p = 0.03) and of decrease in interhemispheric gamma coherence after real-TNS (p = 0.01) was observed. Acute TNS may induce a spatially diffuse desynchronization of fast EEG rhythms in healthy adults, this desynchronization may underpin the antiepileptic effect of TNS described by clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.