Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30039313›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2019

Employees Diagnosed with Cancer: Current Perspectives and Future Directions from an Employer's Point of View.

Sietske J Tamminga, Marije D J Wolvers, Michiel A Greidanus, AnneClaire G N M Zaman, Anna M Braspenning, Monique H W Frings-Dresen, Angela G E M de Boer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Working after cancer: psychological flexibility and the quality of working life.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sietske J TammingaCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.j.tamminga@amc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2228-1187
Marije D J WolversCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel A GreidanusCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
AnneClaire G N M ZamanCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna M BraspenningCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique H W Frings-DresenCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Angela G E M de BoerCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding UVA 2014-7153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose and methods Cancer survivors have a higher risk of adverse work outcomes such as not being able to return to work (RTW). The process of returning to work is complex as a result of the diverse stakeholders and numerous factors involved related to the employee diagnosed with cancer, the work environment, health care system, and the legal system. One of the key stakeholders is the employer, as the employer is in the position to facilitate work accommodations. Therefore, the purpose of this brief review is to consider opportunities regarding the role of the employer to enhance the work participation of employees with cancer. Results and conclusions We currently know little about which aspects of employer support have a positive impact on the ability of employees diagnosed with cancer to retain at work or RTW. In addition, there is a lack of interventions and tools which support employers in their management of employees diagnosed with cancer. The inclusion of employer support into the workplace can help employees diagnosed with cancer with their work retention and RTW, which is an important aspect of their quality of life and benefits the society at large.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHumansInterpersonal RelationsMotivationNeoplasmsOccupational Health ServicesReturn to WorkWorkplaceEmployerInterventionNeoplasmReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID30039313
PMCPMC6531607
OpenAlexW2884719358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.