Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30039282›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2018

Ethical Challenges in the Provision of Mental Health Services for Children and Families During Disasters.

Matthew Hunt, Nicole E Pal, Lisa Schwartz, Dónal O'Mathúna

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew HuntSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 Sir-William-Osler Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada. matthew.hunt@mcgill.ca.
Nicole E PalSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 Sir-William-Osler Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Lisa SchwartzDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Dónal O'MathúnaSchool of Nursing & Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
McGill University · CAImpact · CAThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewAs mental health professionals assist individuals and communities affected by disaster, they are likely to encounter ethical issues. We conducted a review of academic and grey literature to identify ethical issues associated with the provision of mental health care during disasters, with particular attention to children and families. RECENT

findingsWe identified nine categories of ethical challenge: ensuring competent care; protecting confidentiality and privacy; obtaining informed consent and respecting autonomy; providing culturally sensitive care; avoiding harm; allocating limited resources; maintaining neutrality and avoiding bias; addressing issues of liability and employer responsibilities; and conducting research ethically. The organization and provision of mental health services during disasters presents ethical challenges for care providers-as well as for communities, coordinators, and policymakers. Mental health professionals need to navigate this ethical terrain in order to provide needed care to individuals and communities affected by crisis.

Indexed as

ChildConfidentialityCulturally Competent CareDisastersEthics, ResearchFamily HealthHumansMental Health ServicesRelief WorkChildrenDisastersEthicsHealth servicesHumanitarian crisesMental health

Identifiers

PMID30039282
OpenAlexW2883979236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.