Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30039253›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2018

The influence of spinal fusion length on proximal junction biomechanics: a parametric computational study.

Dominika Ignasiak, Tobias Peteler, Tamás F Fekete, Daniel Haschtmann, Stephen J Ferguson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Distal junctional failure in posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of associated factors.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Not just alignment: body shape influences adult spinal deformity biomechanics.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Association between sagittal alignment and loads at the adjacent segment in the fused spine: a combined clinical and musculoskeletal modeling study of 205 patients with adult spinal deformity.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Adjacent segments biomechanics following lumbar fusion surgery: a musculoskeletal finite element model study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biomechanical Effects of Fixation of Different Segments of Goat Lumbar Spine on Adjacent Segmental Motion and Intradiscal Pressure Change.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dominika IgnasiakInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Hönggerbergring 64, HPP-O24, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland. dignasiak@ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8557-0245
Tobias PetelerInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Hönggerbergring 64, HPP-O24, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tamás F FeketeSchulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel HaschtmannSchulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stephen J FergusonInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Hönggerbergring 64, HPP-O24, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHSchulthess-Klinik · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProximal junctional kyphosis and failure are frequent complications in adult spinal deformity surgery with long fusion constructs. The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanics of the proximal segment for fusions of various lengths.

methodsA previously established musculoskeletal model of thoracolumbar spine was used to simulate full-range flexion task for fusions (modeled by introduction of rigid constraints) with lower instrumented vertebrae at L5 or S1 and upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) at any level above, up to T2. Inverse dynamics simulations with force-dependent kinematics were performed for gradually increasing spinal flexion in order to predict global and segmental range of flexion, maximum passive moment, segmental compression and shear forces, which were compared to the uninstrumented case.

resultsFor long fusions, with the UIV at T11 or higher, the model predicted an increase in segmental flexion (by 33-860%, or 1.6°-4.7°) and passive moment (by 39-1370%, or 13-31 Nm) at the proximal junction-generally increasing with fusion length. While the maximum shear force was 57-239% (135-283 N) higher for the proximal junction at the upper thorax (UIV at T6 or above), the compression forces were reduced by up to 44% (375 N).

conclusionsThe length of the instrumentation has an important effect on the proximal segment biomechanics. Despite the limitations of the current model, musculoskeletal modeling appears to be a promising and versatile method to support planning of spinal instrumentation surgeries in the future. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansModels, BiologicalProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularBiomechanicsMusculoskeletal modelProximal junctional failureSpinal fusionThoracolumbar spine

Identifiers

PMID30039253
OpenAlexW2883908570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.