Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30039246›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2018

Abuse liability of mitragynine assessed with a self-administration procedure in rats.

Kai Yue, Theresa A Kopajtic, Jonathan L Katz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Kratom (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine: Bidirectional effects on breathing in rats.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of theThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kai YueWuhan Institute of Biomedical Science, Jianghan University, No. 8 Sanjiaohu Street, Wuhan, China.
Theresa A KopajticPsychobiology Section, Molecular Neuropsychiatry Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Jonathan L KatzPsychobiology Section, Molecular Neuropsychiatry Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. jkatz@intra.nida.nih.gov.
Jianghan University · CNNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Basic Dopamine Transporter Mechanisms Of CocaineZIADA000103 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI KATZ, JONATHAN L · 2009 to 2016
$4.6M
National Institute on Drug Abuse ZIA DA000103-27National Natural Science Foundation of China 81302762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleSubstantial use of the plant kratom for psychoactive effects has driven interest in its abuse liability. Several place conditioning studies suggest abuse liability of the active ingredient mitragynine, though studies of its self-administration have not been published.

methodsBinding of mitragynine to rat brain mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptors was compared to that for heroin and morphine. Self-administration of mitragynine, heroin, methamphetamine, or saline was assessed during single-session substitutions in rats trained to self-administer methamphetamine (0.022 mg/kg/injection, i.v.) during 1-h daily sessions.

resultsMitragynine had > 2- or ~ 16-fold greater affinity for the mu opioid receptor than, respectively, for kappa or delta opioid receptors. Its affinity for the mu receptor was ~ 200-fold less than that for morphine. In rats trained to self-administer methamphetamine, saline substitutions significantly decreased the number of responses, whereas different doses of methamphetamine (0.002-0.068 mg/kg/injection) or heroin (0.001-0.03 mg/kg/injection) maintained self-administration with maximal responding at 0.022 or 0.01 mg/kg/injection, respectively. In contrast, no dose of mitragynine maintained response rates greater than those obtained with saline. Presession mitragynine treatment (0.1 to 3.0 mg/kg) decreased response rates maintained by heroin but had little effect on responding maintained by methamphetamine across the same range of doses.

conclusionsThese results suggest a limited abuse liability of mitragynine and potential for mitragynine treatment to specifically reduce opioid abuse. With the current prevalence of opioid abuse and misuse, it appears currently that mitragynine is deserving of more extensive exploration for its development or that of an analog as a medical treatment for opioid abuse.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHeroinMaleMorphineOpioid-Related DisordersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muSecologanin Tryptamine AlkaloidsSelf AdministrationHeroinmitragynineMorphineReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muSecologanin Tryptamine AlkaloidsAbuse liabilityHeroinKratomMedical treatmentsMethamphetamineMitragynineOpioid abuseRatsSelf-administration

Identifiers

PMID30039246
OpenAlexW2884215484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.