ArticleJournal of applied genetics2018
Identification and expression of genes in response to cassava bacterial blight infection.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic analysis reveals dynamic expression related to malondialdehyde in cassava in response to cassava bacterial blight.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in Genetic Analysis and Breeding of Cassava (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cassava diseases caused by Xanthomonas phaseoli pv. manihotis and Xanthomonas cassavae.Molecular plant pathology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cassava bacterial blight (CBB) caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis (or XAM) is a serious disease of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). In this study, quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with CBB infection were identified in the F1 progenies of a cross between the "Huay Bong 60" and "Hanatee" cassava cultivars. The phenotype of disease severity was observed at 7, 10, and 12 days after inoculation (DAI). A total of 12 QTL were identified, of which 5, 6, and 1 were detected in 7, 10, and 12 DAI samples, respectively. Among all identified QTL, CBB14_10dai_1, CBB14_10dai_2, and CBB14_12dai showed the most significant (P < 0.0001) associations with CBB infection, and explained 21.3, 13.8, and 26.5% of phenotypic variation, respectively. Genes underlying the QTL were identified and their expression was investigated in resistant and susceptible cassava plants by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. The results identified candidate genes that showed significant differences in expression between resistant and susceptible lines, including brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated receptor kinase 1-related (Manes.04G059100), cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 2 (Manes.02G051100), and autophagy-related protein 8a-related (Manes.17G026600) at 7 DAI, and regulator of nonsense transcripts 1 homolog (Manes.17G021900) at both 7 and 12 DAI. The expression pattern of all genes showed higher levels in resistant (B82, B32, B20, and B70) as compared to susceptible (HB60, B100, B95, and B47) plants. Overall, this study has identified QTL and markers linked to CBB infection trait, and identified candidate genes involved in CBB resistance. This information will be of use for better understanding defense mechanisms in cassava to bacterial blight disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.