ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Quantification of
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and follow-up of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy patients: A systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Pooled it
- Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy in women: frequency, characteristics, and diagnostic challenges.Heart failure reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Head-to-head comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Molecular Imaging of Systemic and Cardiac Amyloidosis: Recent Advances and Focus on the Future.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Review
- The flutemetamol analogue cyano-flutemetamol detects myocardial AL and ATTR amyloid deposits: a post-mortem histofluorescence analysis.Amyloid : the international journal of experimental and clinical investigation : the official journal of the International Society of Amyloidosis · 2023Article
- Cardiac amyloidosis: evolving pathogenesis, multimodal diagnostics, and principles of treatment.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- Cardiac amyloidosis characterization by kinetic model fitting on [18F]florbetaben PET images.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Review
- Novel Tracers and Radionuclides in PET Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2021Review
- Nuclear Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis in 2021.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Procedural recommendations of cardiac PET/CT imaging: standardization in inflammatory-, infective-, infiltrative-, and innervation- (4Is) related cardiovascular diseases: a joint collaboration of the EACVI and the EANM: summary.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this work was to determine the optimal tracer kinetic model of METHODS AND
resultsSingle-tissue, reversible and irreversible two-tissue models were fitted to data from seven cardiac amyloidosis patients who underwent
conclusionAn irreversible two-tissue model best describes the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.