Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30039210›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2019

FMST: an Automatic Neuron Tracing Method Based on Fast Marching and Minimum Spanning Tree.

Jian Yang, Ming Hao, Xiaoyang Liu, Zhijiang Wan, Ning Zhong, Hanchuan Peng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tracing weak neuron fibers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improving the Usability of Virtual Reality Neuron Tracing with Topological Elements.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jian YangFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Ming HaoFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyang LiuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Zhijiang WanBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Internet Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Ning ZhongFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China. zhong@maebashi-it.ac.jp.
Hanchuan PengAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA. hanchuan.peng@gmail.com.

Funding

National Basic Research Program of China No. 2014CB744600National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 61420106005Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (CN) No. 4164080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuron reconstruction is an important technique in computational neuroscience. Although there are many reconstruction algorithms, few can generate robust results. In this paper, we propose a reconstruction algorithm called fast marching spanning tree (FMST). FMST is based on a minimum spanning tree method (MST) and improve its performance in two aspects: faster implementation and no loss of small branches. The contributions of the proposed method are as follows. Firstly, the Euclidean distance weight of edges in MST is improved to be a more reasonable value, which is related to the probability of the existence of an edge. Secondly, a strategy of pruning nodes is presented, which is based on the radius of a node's inscribed ball. Thirdly, separate branches of broken neuron reconstructions can be merged into a single tree. FMST and many other state of the art reconstruction methods were implemented on two datasets: 120 Drosophila neurons and 163 neurons with gold standard reconstructions. Qualitative and quantitative analysis on experimental results demonstrates that the performance of FMST is good compared with many existing methods. Especially, on the 91 fruitfly neurons with gold standard and evaluated by five metrics, FMST is one of two methods with best performance among all 27 state of the art reconstruction methods. FMST is a good and practicable neuron reconstruction algorithm, and can be implemented in Vaa3D platform as a neuron tracing plugin.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalNeuronsNeurosciencesFast marchingMinimum spanning treeNeuron morphologyNeuron reconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.