Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30039171›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2018

Sudden vs Pressure Wean From Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Infants Born Before 32 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Christina Friis Jensen, Anna Sellmer, Finn Ebbesen, Rasa Cipliene, Anders Johansen, Rikke Monrad Hansen, Jens Peter Nielsen, Olga Hogreffe Nikitina, Jesper Padkær Petersen, Tine Brink Henriksen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01721629 (Weaning of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Infants Born With a Gestational Age Under 32 Weeks), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01721629 nacompletednot on this map

Weaning of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Infants Born With a Gestational Age Under 32 Weeks: a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAarhus University HospitalRan2012 to 2017Enrolled380ConditionsPrematurity, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, InfantArmsSudden wean of nasal CPAP, Gradual wean of nasal CPAP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. A comparison of methods of discontinuing nasal CPAP in premature infants <30 weeks gestation: a feasibility study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation weaning protocol in neonatal intensive care units in Brazil: a descriptive study.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Duration of noninvasive respiratory support and risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christina Friis JensenPerinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anna SellmerPerinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Finn EbbesenDepartment of Pediatrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Rasa CiplieneDepartment of Pediatrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anders JohansenDepartment of Pediatrics, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Rikke Monrad HansenDepartment of Pediatrics, West Regional Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Jens Peter NielsenDepartment of Pediatrics, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Olga Hogreffe NikitinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Vendsyssel Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.
Jesper Padkær PetersenChild and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tine Brink HenriksenPerinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DKRegional Hospital West Jutland · DKRegionshospitalet Viborg · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is a well-established treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Suboptimal weaning from nCPAP may be associated with lung injury, pulmonary morbidity, and infant weight gain. To our knowledge, the best weaning strategy from nCPAP is unknown. Objective: To compare the effect of sudden wean and pressure wean from nCPAP in very preterm infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, clinical, open-label, multicenter trial was conducted at 6 neonatal intensive care units in Denmark from September 2012 to December 2016 and included infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Interventions: Sudden wean with discontinuation of nCPAP without a prior reduction in pressure. Pressure wean with gradual pressure reduction prior to the discontinuation of nCPAP. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was weight gain velocity from randomization to postmenstrual age 40 weeks. Secondary outcomes included other measures of growth, nCPAP and the duration of oxygen supplementation, postmenstrual age at successful wean and at discharge, successful wean at the first attempt, the number of attempts to wean, and the length of the hospital stay. Prespecified subgroup analyses by gestational age were performed. Results: Of the 372 randomized infants, 185 (49.7%) were randomized to sudden wean and 187 infants (50.3%) to pressure wean. A total of 177 infants in both groups completed the trial (median gestational age for sudden and pressure wean, 30 weeks [interquartile range, 29-31]; male: sudden wean, 89 [50%]; pressure wean, 96 [54%]). There was no difference in mean [SD] weight gain velocity from randomization to 40 weeks postmenstrual age between the 2 groups (22 [6] g/kg/day). No difference was found in any of the secondary outcomes. More infants born before 28 weeks of gestation were successfully weaned from nCPAP during the first attempt in the pressure wean group compared with the sudden wean group (risk difference, 31%; 95% CI, 13%-50%), but there was no difference in the duration of nCPAP and oxygen supplementation. Conclusions and Relevance: Overall, we found no difference in weight gain velocity or any of the secondary outcomes between very preterm infants who were randomized to sudden wean or pressure wean from nCPAP. However, among infants born before 28 weeks' gestation, infants from the pressure wean group were more often successfully weaned during the first attempt without a longer total duration of nCPAP treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01721629.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureContinuous Positive Airway PressureDenmarkFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayMaleRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornTreatment OutcomeVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

PMID30039171
PMCPMC6143058
OpenAlexW2884930939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.