ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2018
The impact of celecoxib on outcomes in advanced prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Current trends in luminescence-based assessment of apoptosis.RSC advances · 2023Review
- Reduced pim-1 expression increases chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity in human androgen-independent prostate cancer cells by inducing apoptosis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent work suggests the selective Cox-2 inhibitor celecoxib delays progression to androgen independence in hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) through inhibition of the androgen receptor (AR) and ErbB signaling. However, human studies examining its effect on delaying disease progression while on hormone therapy are limited. This study explores the effect of celecoxib use on PC survival in VA patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for advanced PC. We retrospectively examined the association between celecoxib use (defined as duration of medication use ≥180 days) in men with PC being treated with ADT in national VA databases. Patients were diagnosed with PC from 2000-2008 and had follow-up through May 2016. Clinical, pathologic and demographic variables were compared by celecoxib use, using Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-squared tests. Associations between celecoxib use and overall survival (OS), skeletal related events (SRE), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were performed using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. Overall, 87,344 patients with PC on ADT were identified. Patients on celecoxib (n=1,581) had lower PSA levels at both diagnosis (7.0 versus 8.7 ng/mL, P<0.001) and initiation of ADT (6.2 versus 7.3 ng/mL, P=0.002) compared to patients not taking celecoxib (n=85,763). Gleason score (P=0.14), death from PC (P=0.07), and number of SREs (P=0.18) were similar between groups. In the Cox multivariable analysis, celecoxib use was not associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, HR, 1.06, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.93-1.21, P=0.38), risk of SRE (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.62-1.44, P=0.80), or improved CSS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78-1.28, P=0.98). Despite an association with lower PSA levels, celecoxib use in PC patients on ADT was not associated with improved cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30038944PMC6055075W2979474386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.