Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30038802›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2018

Experiences with euthanasia requests of persons with SCI in Belgium.

Elly M F Waals, Marcel W M Post, Koenraad Peers, Carlotte Kiekens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elly M F Waals1University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Pellenberg, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8913-7502
Marcel W M PostCentre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht and De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Koenraad Peers1University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Pellenberg, Belgium.
Carlotte Kiekens1University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Pellenberg, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8500-7751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLiving with SCI remains a challenge and some patients fear or are faced with an inability to master this challenge sufficiently to regain a satisfactory quality of life. The suicide rate within the population with SCI is elevated compared with the general population. Especially now that life expectancy of persons with SCI and age at onset of SCI are increasing, caregivers of persons with SCI can be confronted with requests for end-of-life care or even assistance in dying. Euthanasia remains worldwide a controversial topic, but has rarely been discussed in the context of SCI. CASE PRESENTATION: The medical history and the results of in-depth interviews with three persons with tetraplegia, between 36 and 88 years old, with a profound and repeated request for euthanasia testify of the importance of an open-minded dialogue concerning end-of-life questions, in which all options can be considered, and limits of patients' capacities and best care results are acknowledged.

conclusionThese cases suggest that a well-regulated strictly controlled legal framework, handled with prudence and proficiency, can be an added value to the care for persons with SCI.

Identifiers

PMID30038802
PMCPMC6043571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.