ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2018
Taking patient reported outcomes centre stage in cancer research - why has it taken so long?
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Psychometric properties of self-reported measures of psychological birth trauma in puerperae: A COSMIN systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Psychosocial-Spiritual Experiences and Outcomes in Parents of Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus from the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Systematic Review.Pediatric diabetes · 2024Pooled it
- HIV-Specific Reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Unmet needs in sexual health in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review of the evidence.BMC urology · 2020Pooled it
- ePRO-based individual follow-up care for women treated for early breast cancer: impact on service use and workflows.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Trial
- Mapping methods and tools for measuring patient experience in oncology settings: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- A nationwide, longitudinal collection of patient-reported outcomes from prostate cancer patients and controls.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Development of a unified system for assessing health related quality of life across the cancer care continuum: the EUonQoL Delphi study to identify priorities for quality of life domains.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Validation of the European Oncology toolkit for the self-assessment of Quality of Life (EUonQoL-Kit) in cancer patients and survivors: study protocol of a pan European survey.BMC public health · 2024Observational
- Reframing pain: the power of individual and societal factors to enhance pain treatment.Pain reports · 2024Article
- The challenge of using patient reported outcome measures in clinical practice: how do we get there?Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- 15 years of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials leading to GU cancer drug approvals: a systematic review on the quality of data reporting and analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Feasibility of PROMIS using computerized adaptive testing during inpatient rehabilitation.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Conscientious use of patient-reported outcome measures in supportive care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection.Nature communications · 2022Review
- Listening to the Patient Voice Adds Value to Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- The critical need to implement and utilize patient-reported measures of function in cancer care delivery.Cancer · 2022Article
- Dual contribution of the gut microbiome to immunotherapy efficacy and toxicity: supportive care implications and recommendations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- The Symptom Burden and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients in the Gaza Strip, Palestine: A Cross-Sectional Study.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
plain english summaryRoger Wilson challenged cancer professionals in research and care to place the patient perspective and patient reported outcome measures centre stage. The ability to collect information from patients using structured questionnaires (known as Patient Reported Outcome Measures or PROMs) which ask about clinical issues (such as disease symptoms or treatment side-effects) as well as social, emotional and psychological issues has existed for 40 years. They provide a powerful way of working out whether an aspect of diagnosis or treatment for cancer is bringing real benefits to patients that can be measured using these structured questionnaires. When they are used, studies and cancer service developments are clearly constrained to focus on what matters to patients rather than, perhaps what matters to health service professionals or recent exciting but perhaps relatively unproven new technologies. There is good evidence that PROMs can contribute valuable inputs into the results of randomised controlled trials, clinical consultations and surveys of whole populations even at a national level. However, there is a great deal more work to be done on methodology and perhaps to change attitudes and cultures within the healthcare professions before they can deliver all of their potential to bring benefits to cancer patients. ABSTRACT: In response to Roger Wilson's challenge to place a patient-centred approach using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) across all of the patient pathway, we have summarised progress over 40 years. We have critically evaluated what has been achieved to use patient reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials, in routine clinical practice and in population surveys. We conclude that there has been substantial scientific progress but that it has, arguably, been relatively slow. Barriers to placing PROMs centre stage in all of these areas of activity remain in methodology and to a degree in professional attitudes and culture. Active research programmes on methodology and closer working between healthcare professionals, cancer patients and patient advocates are the key requirements to speed up the use and application of PROMs and which should bring benefits to cancer patients and healthcare services.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.