ArticlePolish journal of radiology2018
Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnostics of primary fallopian tube carcinoma - is it useful?
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-Sectional Imaging of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls on CT and MR.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis-part II: uterine emergencies and pelvic inflammatory disease.Insights into imaging · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrimary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) is the rarest form of female genital malignancy. The imaging applied for suspected adnexal masses includes transvaginal ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the vast majority of PFTC is recognised intraoperatively. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study group consisted of seven women with postoperatively histopathological diagnosis of PFTC. To recognise characteristic findings for PFTC, retrospective analysis of preoperative MRI was performed. All patients underwent MRI of the pelvis and abdomen using a 1.5T MR system. Based on the results of the above imaging, suspected adnexal masses were recognised. MRI protocol contained T2-weighted images, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, T2-TIRM, DW EPI, pre- and postcontrast dynamic 3D T1 GRE in transverse orientation, with diffusion weightings of 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 800, and 1200 s/mm2. Regions of interest were outlined by a radiologist, who documented the character of adnexal masses on diffusion-weighted (DW) images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.
resultsIn all seven patients with PFTC unilateral tumour was found. On all DW images (with β values of 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 800, and 1200 s/mm2) the mean signal intensities of solid parts of tumour were significantly higher than the mean signal intensities of normal ovarian tissue (
conclusionsPreoperative diagnostics of PFTC is difficult and mainly based on morphological features. Previous research did not show characteristics of PFTC in post-contrast dynamic imaging. In our material a clear increasing of signal intensity in DW imaging occurred independently of the β value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.