ReviewPolish journal of radiology2018
Hallmark of success: top 50 classics in oral and maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography.
Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top cited articles in Oral Radiology: A bibliometric network analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- A bibliometric and Altmetric analysis of the 100 top most cited articles on dentin adhesives.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis and diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography studies published in Imaging Science in Dentistry from 2011 to 2022.Imaging science in dentistry · 2023Article
- Global trends of dalbavancin: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics · 2022Review
- Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a feasibility study.Urolithiasis · 2021Article
- The 100 most cited articles on lung cancer screening: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Antibiotics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Top 100 Classics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- [Clinical and imaging characteristics of familial gigantiform cementoma. A review of the literature].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to identify the top 50 cited articles on the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for oral and maxillofacial applications and to summarise the characteristics of the most impactful research articles in this domain. MATERIAL AND
methodsA database was generated by combining the search results from Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Elsevier's Scopus to ensure that all top-cited publications were captured. We used three search fields to generate the database: 1) CBCT, 2) oral and maxillofacial pathologies, and 3) oral and maxillofacial anatomical structures. Publications were then ranked by citation counts and reviewed by two independent reviewers.
resultsA total of 50 top publications were included in the study. Their citation count ranged from 43 to 170 with a median of 55.5. Five publications were cited more than 100 times. All except for one paper were published after 2000. The most well published journal was the CONLCUSIONS: Our study identifies 50 research articles with the highest number of citations in oral and maxillofacial CBCT, discusses the characteristics and commonalities between these articles, and predicts future trends in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.