Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30038663›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2018

A year of monitoring 20 mesophilic full-scale bioreactors reveals the existence of stable but different core microbiomes in bio-waste and wastewater anaerobic digestion systems.

Magdalena Calusinska, Xavier Goux, Marie Fossépré, Emilie E L Muller, Paul Wilmes, Philippe Delfosse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phylogenetic diversity and community structure ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel thermophilic generaFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena Calusinska1Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 41 rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-2270-2217
Xavier Goux1Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 41 rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Marie Fossépré1Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 41 rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Emilie E L Muller2Eco-Systems Biology Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, 7 avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Paul Wilmes2Eco-Systems Biology Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, 7 avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Philippe Delfosse1Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 41 rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaerobic digestion (AD) is a microbe-driven process of biomass decomposition to CH

resultsUsing the high-throughput sequencing of small rRNA gene, and a monthly monitoring of the physicochemical parameters for 20 different mesophilic full-scale bioreactors over 1 year, we generated a detailed view of AD microbial ecology towards a better understanding of factors that influence and shape these communities. By studying the broadly distributed OTUs present in over 80% of analysed samples, we identified putatively important core bacteria and archaea to the AD process that accounted for over 70% of the whole microbial community relative abundances. AD reactors localised at the wastewater treatment plants were shown to operate with distinct core microbiomes than the agricultural and bio-waste treating biogas units. We also showed that both the core microbiomes were composed of low (with average community abundance ≤ 1%) and highly abundant microbial populations; the vast majority of which remains yet uncharacterised, e.g. abundant candidate

conclusionsIn this study, we characterised microbial communities in different AD systems that were monitored over a 1-year period. Evidences were shown to support the concept of a core community driving the AD process, whereas the vast majority of dominant microorganisms remain yet to be characterised.

Indexed as

BiogasMicrobial communitiesSmall rRNA gene amplicon high-throughput sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30038663
PMCPMC6052691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.