Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30038647›Full record

ReviewJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2018

ENT COBRA ONTOLOGY: the covariates classification system proposed by the Head & Neck and Skin GEC-ESTRO Working Group for interdisciplinary standardized data collection in head and neck patient cohorts treated with interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy).

Luca Tagliaferri, Ashwini Budrukkar, Jacopo Lenkowicz, Mauricio Cambeiro, Francesco Bussu, Jose Luis Guinot, Guido Hildebrandt, Bengt Johansson, Jens E Meyer, Peter Niehoff and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Can interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) be an alternative to surgery in early-stage oral cavity cancer? A systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. The role of brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) for primary and/or recurrent vulvar cancer: a Gemelli Vul.Can multidisciplinary team systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Art and digital technologies to support resilience during the oncological journey: The Art4ART project.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  11. Development of a prognostic model of overall survival in oropharyngeal cancer from real-world data: PRO.M.E.THE.O.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Radiotherapy as treatment option in biliary cancer patients: a national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) Gastroenterology Group.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Luca TagliaferriFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Ashwini BudrukkarTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Jacopo LenkowiczFondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Mauricio CambeiroClìnica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Francesco BussuHead of the Otolaryngology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Sassari, Italy.
Jose Luis GuinotDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.
Guido HildebrandtUniversity Hospital Radiotherapy Department, University of Rostock, Germany.
Bengt JohanssonDepartment of Oncology, Orebro University Hospital and Orebro University, Sweden.
Jens E MeyerHead & Neck Surgery Department, AK St. George Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter NiehoffDepartment of Radiotherapy, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.
Angeles RovirosaHospital Clinic I Universitaria, Barcelona, Spain.
Zoltán Takácsi-NagyNational Cancer Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
Luca BoldriniFondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Nicola DinapoliFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Vito LanzottiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Andrea DamianiFondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Roberto GattaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Bruno FiondaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Valentina LancellottaRadiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Tamer SororInterdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck - University Hospital S-H, Campus Lübeck, Germany.
Rafael Martìnez MongeClìnica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Vincenzo ValentiniFondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
György KovácsInterdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck - University Hospital S-H, Campus Lübeck, Germany.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari · ITFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESÖrebro University Hospital · SESana Klinikum Offenbach · DETata Memorial Hospital · INUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClinical data collecting is expensive in terms of time and human resources. Data can be collected in different ways; therefore, performing multicentric research based on previously stored data is often difficult. The primary objective of the ENT COBRA (COnsortium for BRachytherapy data Analysis) ontology is to define a specific terminological system to standardized data collection for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients treated with interventional radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsENT-COBRA is a consortium for standardized data collection for H&N patients treated with interventional radiotherapy. It is linked to H&N and Skin GEC-ESTRO Working Group and includes 11 centers from 6 countries. Its ontology was firstly defined by a multicentric working group, then evaluated by the consortium followed by a multi-professional technical commission involving a mathematician, an engineer, a physician with experience in data storage, a programmer, and a software expert.

resultsTwo hundred and forty variables were defined on 13 input forms. There are 3 levels, each offering a specific type of analysis: 1. Registry level (epidemiology analysis); 2. Procedures level (standard oncology analysis); 3. Research level (radiomics analysis). The ontology was approved by the consortium and technical commission; an ad-hoc software architecture ("broker") remaps the data present in already existing storage systems of the various centers according to the shared terminology system. The first data sharing was successfully performed using COBRA software and the ENT COBRA Ontology, automatically collecting data directly from 3 different hospital databases (Lübeck, Navarra, and Rome) in November 2017.

conclusionsThe COBRA Ontology is a good response to the multi-dimensional criticalities of data collection, retrieval, and usability. It allows to create a software for large multicentric databases with implementation of specific remapping functions wherever necessary. This approach is well-received by all involved parties, primarily because it does not change a single center's storing technologies, procedures, and habits.

Indexed as

data collectionENT-COBRAGEC-ESTROhead and neck cancerpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID30038647
PMCPMC6052377
OpenAlexW2864789400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.