Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30038642›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2018

Comparative study of concomitant chemoradiation versus concomitant chemoradiation followed by high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a single institutional study.

Anirban Halder, Rituparna Biswas, Anshuman Ghosh, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anirban HalderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
Rituparna BiswasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
Anshuman GhoshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
Aloke Ghosh DastidarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to compare efficacy and toxicity between concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) and CCRT in inoperable, locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. MATERIAL AND

methodsThirty-four patients with inoperable, locally advanced esophageal carcinoma were randomized into two arms. In the CCRT + ILBT arm (arm A), eighteen patients received 50.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction over 5.6 weeks, along with concurrent cisplatin (75 mg/m

resultsWith a median follow-up of 13 months, the complete response rate was 88.89% in arm A and 87.50% in arm B (

conclusionsIn our study, addition of brachytherapy as a boost following concurrent chemoradiation failed to improve treatment outcomes without additional toxicity in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

concurrent chemoradiotherapydisease-free survivalesophageal cancerintraluminal brachytherapy

Identifiers

PMID30038642
PMCPMC6052387
OpenAlexW2884778232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.