Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30038569›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Advancements in Regenerative Strategies Through the Continuum of Burn Care.

Randolph Stone Ii, Shanmugasundaram Natesan, Christine J Kowalczewski, Lauren H Mangum, Nicholas E Clay, Ryan M Clohessy, Anders H Carlsson, David H Tassin, Rodney K Chan, Julie A Rizzo and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STRIPED CATFISHAnnals of burns and fire disasters · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Scars.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Randolph Stone IiCombat Trauma and Burn Injury Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Shanmugasundaram NatesanCombat Trauma and Burn Injury Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Christine J KowalczewskiCombat Trauma and Burn Injury Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Lauren H MangumCombat Trauma and Burn Injury Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Nicholas E ClayCombat Trauma and Burn Injury Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Ryan M ClohessyCombat Trauma and Burn Injury Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Anders H CarlssonDental and Craniofacial Trauma Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
David H TassinDental and Craniofacial Trauma Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Rodney K ChanDental and Craniofacial Trauma Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Julie A RizzoBurn Flight Team, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.
Robert J ChristyCombat Trauma and Burn Injury Research, US Army Institute of Surgical Research San Antonio, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burns are caused by several mechanisms including flame, scald, chemical, electrical, and ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Approximately half a million burn cases are registered annually, of which 40 thousand patients are hospitalized and receive definitive treatment. Burn care is very resource intensive as the treatment regimens and length of hospitalization are substantial. Burn wounds are classified based on depth as superficial (first degree), partial-thickness (second degree), or full-thickness (third degree), which determines the treatment necessary for successful healing. The goal of burn wound care is to fully restore the barrier function of the tissue as quickly as possible while minimizing infection, scarring, and contracture. The aim of this review is to highlight how tissue engineering and regenerative medicine strategies are being used to address the unique challenges of burn wound healing and define the current gaps in care for both partial- and full-thickness burn injuries. This review will present the current standard of care (SOC) and provide information on various treatment options that have been tested pre-clinically or are currently in clinical trials. Due to the complexity of burn wound healing compared to other skin injuries, burn specific treatment regimens must be developed. Recently, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine strategies have been developed to improve skin regeneration that can restore normal skin physiology and limit adverse outcomes, such as infection, delayed re-epithelialization, and scarring. Our emphasis will be centered on how current clinical and pre-clinical research of pharmacological agents, biomaterials, and cellular-based therapies can be applied throughout the continuum of burn care by targeting the stages of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, cell proliferation, and matrix remodeling.

Indexed as

biomaterialsburnsdrug deliverygrowth factorsregenerative medicinestem cellstissue engineeringwound healing

Identifiers

PMID30038569
PMCPMC6046385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.