Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30038479›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2018

The Association Between Menthol Perceptions and Support for a Policy Ban Among US Smokers.

Jessica M Rath, Marisa Greenberg, Lindsay Pitzer, Brittany Emelle, Molly Green, Shiyang Michael Liu, Jeffrey Willett, Shyanika W Rose, Elizabeth C Hair, Donna Vallone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Widespread Misperceptions Among U.S. Adults About Tobacco Company Engagement in Black and African American Communities.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Youth and Young Adult Awareness of and Perceptions About Tobacco Marketing as a Social Justice Issue.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. National Support for a Menthol Cigarette Sales Ban.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica M RathSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Marisa GreenbergSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Lindsay PitzerSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Brittany EmelleSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Molly GreenSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Shiyang Michael LiuSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Jeffrey WillettSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Shyanika W RoseSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Elizabeth C HairSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Donna ValloneSchroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
American Legacy Foundation · USJohns Hopkins University · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between menthol perceptions and support for a national menthol ban. Participants: Data were collected from a nationally representative probability-based panel of adults aged ≥18 years during June 21, 2016 through July 18, 2016. A total of 1,303 respondents, including an oversample of 300 African Americans, completed the survey. Main Outcome Measures: Weighted logistic regression models examined the relationship between menthol perceptions, specifically related to health and addiction, and the outcome measure: support for a menthol ban, by menthol smoking status. All models controlled for age, sex, education level, and race/ethnicity. Results: The association between reporting accurate menthol health perceptions differed by menthol preference. Among non-menthol smokers, there was no association between accurate menthol health perceptions and support of a menthol ban while more accurate menthol perceptions of addiction were associated with greater support of a menthol ban (aOR=2.83, CI=1.19-6.72). Among menthol smokers, more accurate health-related menthol perceptions were associated with increased odds of supporting a menthol ban (aOR=3.90, CI=1.02-14.79) while more accurate menthol addiction perceptions were not. Conclusions: Fewer current menthol smokers support a menthol ban than current non-menthol smokers given its effect on their preferred product. Given the large proportions of smokers who have misperceptions of the health consequences and addictive properties of menthol, there is a moral imperative to inform those who use these products. Findings suggest the need for tailored messaging strategies targeted to reach menthol smokers who will be most impacted by a ban, but also have the most to gain from such a policy change.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PolicyMentholAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSmokersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultMentholHealth CommunicationsMentholSmoke-Free Policy

Identifiers

PMID30038479
PMCPMC6051512
OpenAlexW2846417528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.