Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30038307›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2018

The type VI secretion system deploys antifungal effectors against microbial competitors.

Katharina Trunk, Julien Peltier, Yi-Chia Liu, Brian D Dill, Louise Walker, Neil A R Gow, Michael J R Stark, Janet Quinn, Henrik Strahl, Matthias Trost and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structural basis of iron piracy by human gutProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. A farnesol-sensing triad inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. microLife · 2026
    Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina TrunkDivision of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Julien PeltierMRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Yi-Chia LiuDivision of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Brian D DillMRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-3044
Louise WalkerAberdeen Fungal Group, Institute of Medical Sciences, MRC Centre for Medical Mycology at the University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Neil A R GowAberdeen Fungal Group, Institute of Medical Sciences, MRC Centre for Medical Mycology at the University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Michael J R StarkCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-191X
Janet QuinnInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Henrik StrahlCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4416-2178
Matthias TrostMRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. matthias.trost@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-700X
Sarah J CoulthurstDivision of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. s.j.coulthurst@dundee.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0808-1875
University of Dundee · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBMRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A500_1020Medical Research Council MC_UU_12016/5Medical Research Council MR/K00011X/1Medical Research Council MR/N006364/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between bacterial and fungal cells shape many polymicrobial communities. Bacteria elaborate diverse strategies to interact and compete with other organisms, including the deployment of protein secretion systems. The type VI secretion system (T6SS) delivers toxic effector proteins into host eukaryotic cells and competitor bacterial cells, but, surprisingly, T6SS-delivered effectors targeting fungal cells have not been reported. Here we show that the 'antibacterial' T6SS of Serratia marcescens can act against fungal cells, including pathogenic Candida species, and identify the previously undescribed effector proteins responsible. These antifungal effectors, Tfe1 and Tfe2, have distinct impacts on the target cell, but both can ultimately cause fungal cell death. 'In competition' proteomics analysis revealed that T6SS-mediated delivery of Tfe2 disrupts nutrient uptake and amino acid metabolism in fungal cells, and leads to the induction of autophagy. Intoxication by Tfe1, in contrast, causes a loss of plasma membrane potential. Our findings extend the repertoire of the T6SS and suggest that antifungal T6SSs represent widespread and important determinants of the outcome of bacterial-fungal interactions.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAutophagyCandidaGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMicrobial ViabilityProteomicsSerratia marcescensType VI Secretion SystemsAntifungal AgentsType VI Secretion Systems

Identifiers

PMID30038307
PMCPMC6071859
OpenAlexW2884767381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.