Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30038279›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2018

Principles governing the integration of landmark and self-motion cues in entorhinal cortical codes for navigation.

Malcolm G Campbell, Samuel A Ocko, Caitlin S Mallory, Isabel I C Low, Surya Ganguli, Lisa M Giocomo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Theta Activity Supports Landmark-Based Correction of Naturalistic Human Path Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AneLife · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. behaviorMate: AnbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malcolm G CampbellDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. malcolmc@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1971-8923
Samuel A OckoDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Caitlin S MalloryDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Isabel I C LowDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Surya GanguliDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lisa M GiocomoDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. giocomo@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-2528
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH020016 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin L Gardner, Merritt C Maduke · 1997 to 2026
$16.2M
The Ionic Basis of Spatial Codes in Medial Entorhinal CortexR01MH106475 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Spatial Codes Across the Medial Entorhinal Cortex for Memory and NavigationR56MH106475 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA · 2020 to 2020
$398k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106475NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH106475NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To guide navigation, the nervous system integrates multisensory self-motion and landmark information. We dissected how these inputs generate spatial representations by recording entorhinal grid, border and speed cells in mice navigating virtual environments. Manipulating the gain between the animal's locomotion and the visual scene revealed that border cells responded to landmark cues while grid and speed cells responded to combinations of locomotion, optic flow and landmark cues in a context-dependent manner, with optic flow becoming more influential when it was faster than expected. A network model explained these results by revealing a phase transition between two regimes in which grid cells remain coherent with or break away from the landmark reference frame. Moreover, during path-integration-based navigation, mice estimated their position following principles predicted by our recordings. Together, these results provide a theoretical framework for understanding how landmark and self-motion cues combine during navigation to generate spatial representations and guide behavior.

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsEntorhinal CortexEvoked PotentialsFemaleLocomotionMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMovementNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsOrientationPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVirtual RealityVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID30038279
PMCPMC6205817
OpenAlexW2883168056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.