ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2019
Cochlear Frequency Tuning and Otoacoustic Emissions.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Swept Along: Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions Using Continuously Varying Stimuli.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Review
- Similar Tuning of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Ratio Functions and Cochlear Vibrations in Mice.AIP conference proceedings · 2024Article
- Estimation of Cochlear Frequency Selectivity Using a Convolution Model of Forward-Masked Compound Action Potentials.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Cooling the Cochlea: Slowing Down Metabolism May Be a Way of Protecting Hearing from Surgical Trauma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Bandpass Shape of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Ratio Functions Reflects Cochlear Frequency Tuning in Normal-Hearing Mice.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Article
- Neural coding of dichotic pitches in auditory midbrain.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- A cochlea with three parts? Evidence from otoacoustic emission phase in humans.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- The Tectorial Membrane: Mechanical Properties and Functions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019Review
- Mammalian behavior and physiology converge to confirm sharper cochlear tuning in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Nonlinear cochlear mechanics without direct vibration-amplification feedback.Physical review researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked from the inner ear are the barely audible, signature byproduct of the delicate hydromechanical amplifier that evolved within its bony walls. Compared to the sounds evoked from the ears of common laboratory animals, OAEs from human ears have exceptionally long delays, typically exceeding those of cats, guinea pigs, and chinchillas by a factor of two to three. This review asks "Why are human OAE delays so long?" and recounts efforts to locate answers in the characteristics of mechanical frequency selectivity in the inner ear. The road to understanding species differences in OAE delay leads to the identification of new invariances and to the emergence of new questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.