ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2018
Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- High prevalence of articles with image-related problems in animal studies of subarachnoid hemorrhage and low rates of correction by publishers.PLoS biology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence to enhance research integrity in evidence-based medicine: toward scalable trustworthiness assessment.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- ASM incorporates Imagetwin to address image duplication and preserve scientific accuracy.mBio · 2025Article
- How good are medical students and researchers in detecting duplications in digital images from research articles: a cross-sectional survey.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
- Experts fail to reliably detect AI-generated histological data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The changing roles of scientific journals.mBio · 2024Review
- Article
- Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses.Nature methods · 2024Review
- Inappropriate image duplications in rhinology research publications.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges.Journal for general philosophy of science = Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie · 2022Article
- Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors.Scientometrics · 2021Article
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.Journal of medical genetics · 2019Article
- Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2019Article
- Figure errors, sloppy science, and fraud: keeping eyes on your data.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2019Article
- Making the scientific literature fail-safe.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed 960 papers published in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.