SynthesisBMJ open2018
Accuracy of administrative databases in detecting primary breast cancer diagnoses: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04331535 (Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Polygenic Risk Scoring for Common Diseases in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Polygenic Risk Scoring for Common Diseases in Primary Care
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy and respiratory illness in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective observational cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Small-Area Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study Using Hospital Discharge and Death Registration Data.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Integrating healthcare utilization databases for cancer ascertainment in a prospective cohort in a limited resource setting: the Mexican Teachers' Cohort.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Association of platinum-based chemotherapy with live birth and infertility in female survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer.Fertility and sterility · 2024Article
- A matched cohort study evaluating whether spironolactone or tetracycline-class antibiotic use among female acne patients is associated with breast cancer development risk.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Early Ascertainment of Breast Cancer Diagnoses Comparing Self-Reported Questionnaires and Electronic Health Record Data Warehouse: The WISDOM Study.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Maternal comorbidity and adverse perinatal outcomes in survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer: A cohort study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of Coding Algorithms to Identify Patients with Incident Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in United States Healthcare Claims Data.Clinical epidemiology · 2023Article
- Colorectal Cancer Risk Is Impacted by Sex and Type of Surgery After Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2022Article
- Long-term antimüllerian hormone patterns differ by cancer treatment exposures in young breast cancer survivors.Fertility and sterility · 2022Article
- Missing something? A scoping review of venous thromboembolic events and their associations with bariatric surgery. Refining the evidence base.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Article
- Detection of incident breast and colorectal cancer cases from an administrative healthcare database in Catalonia, Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020Article
- Identifying incident cancer cases in dispensing claims: A validation study using Australia's Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data.International journal of population data science · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the Incidence of Hematologic Malignant Neoplasms Among Breast Cancer Survivors in France.JAMA network open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo define the accuracy of administrative datasets to identify primary diagnoses of breast cancer based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th or 10th revision codes.
designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library (April 2017). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria were: (a) the presence of a reference standard; (b) the presence of at least one accuracy test measure (eg, sensitivity) and (c) the use of an administrative database. DATA EXTRACTION: Eligible studies were selected and data extracted independently by two reviewers; quality was assessed using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy criteria. DATA ANALYSIS: Extracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach.
resultsFrom 2929 records screened 21 studies were included (data collection period between 1977 and 2011). Eighteen studies evaluated ICD-9 codes (11 of which assessed both invasive breast cancer (code 174.x) and carcinoma in situ (ICD-9 233.0)); three studies evaluated invasive breast cancer-related ICD-10 codes. All studies except one considered incident cases.The initial algorithm results were: sensitivity ≥80% in 11 of 17 studies (range 57%-99%); positive predictive value was ≥83% in 14 of 19 studies (range 15%-98%) and specificity ≥98% in 8 studies. The combination of the breast cancer diagnosis with surgical procedures, chemoradiation or radiation therapy, outpatient data or physician claim may enhance the accuracy of the algorithms in some but not all circumstances. Accuracy for breast cancer based on outpatient or physician's data only or breast cancer diagnosis in secondary position diagnosis resulted low.
conclusionBased on the retrieved evidence, administrative databases can be employed to identify primary breast cancer. The best algorithm suggested is ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes located in primary position. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015026881.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.