Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30037788›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2018

Expanding Opportunities for Professional Development: Utilization of Twitter by Early Career Women in Academic Medicine and Science.

Jaime D Lewis, Kathleen E Fane, Angela M Ingraham, Ayesha Khan, Anne M Mills, Susan C Pitt, Danielle Ramo, Roseann I Wu, Susan M Pollart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Digital Strategy and Social Media for Infectious Diseases.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Social Media: Flattening Hierarchies for Women and Black, Indigenous, People Of Color (BIPOC) to Enter the Room Where It Happens.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Harnessing the Power of Medical Twitter for Mentorship.Journal of graduate medical education · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaime D LewisDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-5537
Kathleen E FaneDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9119-0326
Angela M IngrahamDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-7324
Ayesha KhanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-8503
Anne M MillsDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-4857
Susan C PittDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6978-3408
Danielle RamoWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-5713
Roseann I WuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8073-3965
Susan M PollartDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7495-8786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of women entering medical school and careers in science is increasing; however, women remain the minority of those in senior faculty and leadership positions. Barriers contributing to the shortage of women in academics and academic leadership are numerous, including a shortage of role models and mentors. Thus, achieving equity in a timelier manner will require more than encouraging women to pursue these fields of study or waiting long enough for those in the pipelines to be promoted. Social media provides new ways to connect and augments traditional forms of communication. These alternative avenues may allow women in academic medicine to obtain the support they are otherwise lacking. In this perspective, we reflect on the role of Twitter as a supplemental method for navigating the networks of academic medicine. The discussion includes the use of Twitter to obtain (1) access to role models, (2) peer-to-peer interactions, and continuous education, and (3) connections with those entering the pipeline-students, trainees, and mentees. This perspective also offers suggestions for developing a Twitter network. By participating in the "Twittersphere," women in academic medicine may enhance personal and academic relationships that will assist in closing the gender divide.

Indexed as

academic successfemaleleadershipprofessional developmentsocial media

Identifiers

PMID30037788
PMCPMC6079299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.