Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30037786›Full record

ReviewJMIR mental health2018

For Better or for Worse? A Systematic Review of the Evidence on Social Media Use and Depression Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Minorities.

César G Escobar-Viera, Darren L Whitfield, Charles B Wessel, Ariel Shensa, Jaime E Sidani, Andre L Brown, Cristian J Chandler, Beth L Hoffman, Michael P Marshal, Brian A Primack

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Social Media and Youth Mental Health.Current psychiatry reports · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

César G Escobar-Viera *Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, School of Medicine, University of Pittburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1031-499X
Darren L Whitfield *Center for LGBT Health Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9231-7803
Charles B Wessel *Health Sciences Library, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5018-0156
Ariel Shensa *Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, School of Medicine, University of Pittburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-217X
Jaime E Sidani *Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, School of Medicine, University of Pittburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-8755
Andre L Brown *Center for LGBT Health Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2022-8283
Cristian J Chandler *Center for LGBT Health Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1770-4357
Beth L Hoffman *Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, School of Medicine, University of Pittburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-8748
Michael P Marshal *Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9271-4777
Brian A Primack *Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, School of Medicine, University of Pittburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-0939
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Social Media Use and Depression Outcomes among U.S. Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Young AdultsK99MD012813 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ESCOBAR-VIERA, CÉSAR GABRIEL · 2018 to 2019
$275k
NIMHD NIH HHS K99 MD012813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 90% of adults in the United States have at least one social media account, and lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) persons are more socially active on social media than heterosexuals. Rates of depression among LGB persons are between 1.5- and 2-fold higher than those among their heterosexual counterparts. Social media allows users to connect, interact, and express ideas, emotions, feelings, and thoughts. Thus, social media use might represent both a protective and a risk factor for depression among LGB persons. Studying the nature of the relationship between social media use and depression among LGB individuals is a necessary step to inform public health interventions for this population.

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to synthesize and critique the evidence on social media use and depression among LGB populations.

methodsWe conducted a literature search for quantitative and qualitative studies published between January 2003 and June 2017 using 3 electronic databases. Articles were included if they were peer-reviewed, were in English, assessed social media use either quantitatively or qualitatively, measured depression, and focused on LGB populations. A minimum of two authors independently extracted data from each study using an a priori developed abstraction form. We assessed appropriate reporting of studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research for quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively.

resultsWe included 11 articles in the review; 9 studies were quantitative and cross-sectional and 2 were qualitative. Appropriate reporting of results varied greatly. Across quantitative studies, we found heterogeneity in how social media use was defined and measured. Cyberbullying was the most studied social media experience and was associated with depression and suicidality. Qualitative studies found that while social media provides a space to disclose minority experiences and share ways to cope and get support, constant surveillance of one's social media profile can become a stressor, potentially leading to depression. In most studies, sexual minority participants were identified inconsistently.

conclusionsThis review supports the need for research on the role of social media use on depression outcomes among LBG persons. Using social media may be both a protective and a risk factor for depression among LGB individuals. Support gained via social media may buffer the impact of geographic isolation and loneliness. Negative experiences such as cyberbullying and other patterns of use may be associated with depression. Future research would benefit from more consistent definitions of both social media use and study populations. Moreover, use of larger samples and accounting for patterns of use and individuals' experiences on social media may help better understand the factors that impact LGB mental health disparities.

Indexed as

bisexualdepressiongaylesbiansexual minoritiessocial mediasocial networking sitessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30037786
PMCPMC6079300
OpenAlexW2807218926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.