ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics2018
Ligand binding complexes in lipocalins: Underestimation of the stoichiometry parameter (n).
Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mammalian derived lipocalin and secretoglobin respiratory allergens strongly bind ligands with potentially immune modulating properties.Frontiers in allergy · 2022Article
- Removal and Replacement of Endogenous Ligands from Lipid-Bound Proteins and Allergens.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021Article
- Tear Lipocalin and Lipocalin-Interacting Membrane Receptor.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Hydrophobic ligands influence the structure, stability, and processing of the major cockroach allergen Bla g 1.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The stoichiometry of a ligand binding reaction to a protein is given by a parameter (n). The value of this parameter may indicate the presence of protein monomer or dimers in the binding complex. Members of the lipocalin superfamily show variation in the stoichiometry of binding to ligands. In some cases the stoichiometry parameter (n) has been variously reported for the same protein as mono- and multimerization of the complex. Prime examples include retinol binding protein, β lactoglobulin and tear lipocalin, also called lipocalin-1(LCN1). Recent work demonstrated the stoichiometric ratio for ceramide:tear lipocalin varied (range n = 0.3-0.75) by several different methods. The structure of ceramide raises the intriguing possibility of a lipocalin dimer complex with each lipocalin molecule attached to one of the two alkyl chains of ceramide. The stoichiometry of the ceramide-tear lipocalin binding complex was explored in detail using size exclusion chromatography and time resolved fluorescence anisotropy. Both methods showed consistent results that tear lipocalin remains monomeric when bound to ceramide. Delipidation experiments suggest the most likely explanation is that the low 'n' values result from prior occupancy of the binding sites by native ligands. Lipocalins such as tear lipocalin that have numerous binding partners are particularly prone to an underestimated apparent stoichiometry parameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.