Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30037647›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2018

Continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for adults with repeated urinary tract infections (AnTIC): a randomised, open-label trial.

Holly Fisher, Yemi Oluboyede, Thomas Chadwick, Mohamed Abdel-Fattah, Catherine Brennand, Mandy Fader, Simon Harrison, Paul Hilton, James Larcombe, Paul Little and 12 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Trimethoprim resistance inJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A review of the mechanisms that confer antibiotic resistance in pathotypes ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Holly FisherInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Electronic address: holly.fisher@newcastle.ac.uk.
Yemi OluboyedeInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Thomas ChadwickInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mohamed Abdel-FattahInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Catherine BrennandNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mandy FaderHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Simon HarrisonDepartment of Urology, Mid-Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Paul HiltonInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
James LarcombeSkerne Medical Centre, Sedgefield, UK.
Paul LittleHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Doreen McClurgNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Elaine McCollInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
James N'DowInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Laura TernentInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nikesh ThiruchelvamDepartment of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Anthony TimoneyBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Luke ValeInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Katherine WaltonDepartment of Microbiology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Alexander von Wilamowitz-MoellendorffNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jennifer WilkinsonNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ruth WoodNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Robert PickardInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GBMid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepeated symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) affect 25% of people who use clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC) to empty their bladder. We aimed to determine the benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of recurrent UTIs in adult users of CISC.

methodsIn this randomised, open-label, superiority trial, we enrolled participants from 51 UK National Health Service organisations. These participants were community-dwelling (as opposed to hospital inpatient) users of CISC with recurrent UTIs. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) to receive either antibiotic prophylaxis once daily (prophylaxis group) or no prophylaxis (control group) for 12 months by use of an internet-based system with permuted blocks of variable length. Trial and laboratory staff who assessed outcomes were masked to allocation but participants were aware of their treatment group. The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic, antibiotic-treated UTIs over 12 months. Participants who completed at least 6 months of follow-up were assumed to provide a reliable estimate of UTI incidence and were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. Change in antimicrobial resistance of urinary and faecal bacteria was monitored as a secondary outcome. The AnTIC trial is registered at ISRCTN, number 67145101; and EudraCT, number 2013-002556-32.

findingsBetween Nov 25, 2013, and Jan 29, 2016, we screened 1743 adult users of CISC for eligibility, of whom 404 (23%) participants were enrolled between Nov 26, 2013, and Jan 31, 2016. Of these 404 participants, 203 (50%) were allocated to receive prophylaxis and 201 (50%) to receive no prophylaxis. 1339 participants were excluded before randomisation. The primary analysis included 181 (89%) adults allocated to the prophylaxis group and 180 (90%) adults in the no prophylaxis (control) group. 22 participants in the prophylaxis group and 21 participants in the control group were not included in the primary analysis because they were missing follow-up data before 6 months. The incidence of symptomatic antibiotic-treated UTIs over 12 months was 1·3 cases per person-year (95% CI 1·1-1·6) in the prophylaxis group and 2·6 (2·3-2·9) in the control group, giving an incidence rate ratio of 0·52 (0·44-0·61; p<0·0001), indicating a 48% reduction in UTI frequency after treatment with prophylaxis. Use of prophylaxis was well tolerated: we recorded 22 minor adverse events in the prophylaxis group related to antibiotic prophylaxis during the study, predominantly gastrointestinal disturbance (six participants), skin rash (six participants), and candidal infection (four participants). However, resistance against the antibiotics used for UTI treatment was more frequent in urinary isolates from the prophylaxis group than in those from the control group at 9-12 months of trial participation (nitrofurantoin 12 [24%] of 51 participants from the prophylaxis group vs six [9%] of 64 participants from the control group with at least one isolate; p=0·038), trimethoprim (34 [67%] of 51 vs 21 [33%] of 64; p=0·0003), and co-trimoxazole (26 [53%] of 49 vs 15 [24%] of 62; p=0·002).

interpretationContinuous antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in reducing UTI frequency in CISC users with recurrent UTIs, and it is well tolerated in these individuals. However, increased resistance of urinary bacteria is a concern that requires surveillance if prophylaxis is started.

fundingUK National Institute for Health Research.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCatheter-Related InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrofurantoinTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsNitrofurantoinTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID30037647
PMCPMC6105581
OpenAlexW2809842387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.