ArticleComparative medicine2018
Crossmatching Maternal and Fetal Blood in Sheep.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal-fetal Blood Major Crossmatching in Merino Sheep.Comparative medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the incidence of ex vivo incompatibility between ovine maternal RBC and fetal plasma. Time-mated singleton pregnant ewes (n = 8) underwent cesarean delivery of the fetus; at the time of delivery, paired maternal and fetal blood samples were collected and subsequently separated for storage as packed RBC and fresh frozen plasma. Gel column crossmatching was performed 3 to 4 wk later. All fetus-dam crossmatches were considered major crossmatches, combining fetal (recipient) plasma with dam (donor) RBC. The plasma of 8 fetuses was cross-matched with RBC from 5 dams; all autologous controls were negative, and all but one crossmatch (1 of 40, 2.5%) were considered compatible. In addition, the plasma of 3 dams was crossmatched with RBC from 5 dams; all autologous controls were negative; however, significant incompatibility was noted. In total, 4 of 13 (30.8%) dam-dam crossmatches were considered incompatible. The results of this initial study suggest that when a single animal receives multiple blood-product transfusions, the risk of an immunologic transfusion reaction can be reduced by ensuring that the blood products are obtained from a single donor, performing a crossmatch prior to transfusion, and the use of synthetic products to increase the oxygen carrying capacity of fetal blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.