Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30037349›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2018

Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications.

M C Inhorn, D Birenbaum-Carmeli, J Birger, L M Westphal, J Doyle, N Gleicher, D Meirow, M Dirnfeld, D Seidman, A Kahane and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Social Freezing: Pressing Pause on Fertility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Fertility planning for women in medicine: a call for an active approach.International journal of women's dermatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Financing future fertility: Women's views on funding egg freezing.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M C InhornDepartment of Anthropology, Yale University, 10 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA. marcia.inhorn@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7456-7120
D Birenbaum-CarmeliDepartment of Nursing, University of Haifa, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
J Birger, Larchmont, USA.
L M WestphalStanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Stanford University, 1195 W. Fremont Ave, Sunnyvale, CA, 94087, USA.
J DoyleShady Grove Fertility, 9600 Blackwell Road, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
N GleicherCenter for Human Reproduction, 21 E. 69th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
D MeirowDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, IVF and Fertility Unit, 1 Emek Ha'ella St, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
M DirnfeldDivision Reproductive Endocrinology-IVF, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Ruth & Bruce Faculty of Medicine, Technion, 3436212, Haifa, Israel.
D SeidmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, IVF and Fertility Unit, 1 Emek Ha'ella St, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
A KahaneAssuta Medical Center, 13 Eliezer Mazal, 75653, Rishoon Lezion, Israel.
P PatrizioYale Fertility Center, Yale University, 150 Sargent Drive, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation BCS-1356136Wellcome Trust 209829/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhat are the underlying socio-demographic factors that lead healthy women to preserve their fertility through elective egg freezing (EEF)? Many recent reviews suggest that women are intentionally postponing fertility through EEF to pursue careers and achieve reproductive autonomy. However, emerging empirical evidence suggests that women may be resorting to EEF for other reasons, primarily the lack of a partner with whom to pursue childbearing. The aim of this study is thus to understand what socio-demographic factors may underlie women's use of EEF.

methodsA binational qualitative study was conducted from June 2014 to August 2016 to assess the socio-demographic characteristics and life circumstances of 150 healthy women who had undertaken at least one cycle of elective egg freezing (EEF) in the United States and Israel, two countries where EEF has been offered in IVF clinics over the past 7-8 years. One hundred fourteen American women who completed EEF were recruited from 4 IVF clinics in the US (2 academic, 2 private) and 36 women from 3 IVF clinics in Israel (1 academic, 2 private). In-depth, audio-recorded interviews lasting from 0.5 to 2 h were undertaken and later transcribed verbatim for qualitative data analysis.

resultsWomen in both countries were educated professionals (100%), and 85% undertook EEF because they lacked a partner. This "lack of a partner" problem was reflected in women's own assessments of why they were single in their late 30s, despite their desires for marriage and childbearing. Women themselves assessed partnership problems from four perspectives: 1) women's higher expectations; 2) men's lower commitments; 3) skewed gender demography; and 4) self-blame. DISCUSSION: The "lack of a partner" problem reflects growing, but little discussed international socio-demographic disparities in educational achievement. University-educated women now significantly outnumber university-educated men in the US, Israel, and nearly 75 other societies around the globe, according to World Bank data. Thus, educated women increasingly face a deficit of educated men with whom to pursue childbearing.

conclusionAmong healthy women, EEF is a technological concession to gender-based socio-demographic disparities, which leave many highly educated women without partners during their prime childbearing years. This information is important for reproductive specialists who counsel single EEF patients, and for future research on EEF in diverse national settings.

Indexed as

Educational StatusFemaleFertility PreservationHumansIsraelSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesWomenEducationFertility preservationGenderIsraelMen as partnersOocyte cryopreservationReproductive epidemiologySingle womenSocio-demographyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30037349
PMCPMC6056999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.